Which personal injury & compensation law brands
AI recommends in the US
Brands ranked by mention rate on ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Perplexity
- Brands
- 28
- Questions
- 351
- Answers
- 4,212
- AI engines
- 4
01 · Brand leader
Top 10 brands by mention rate
No single brand runs away with the category.
Several brands compete for the top places.
| # | Brand | Mention rate Share of questions where Google AI Mode names the brand | Share of voice The brand’s share of all brand mentions in the engine’s answers | 95% range The interval the true mention rate most likely falls in | In top 20 of The brand’s place inside each engine’s own top 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11–3 | Morgan & Morgan | 8.4% | 20.4% | 5.9–11.7 | ChatGPT1Gemini1Google AI Mode1Perplexity1 |
| 21–10 | The Cochran Firm | 4.9% | 11.8% | 3.1–7.7 | ChatGPT2Gemini2Google AI Mode2Perplexity2 |
| 31–13 | Ben Crump Law | 4.2% | 12.8% | 2.5–6.8 | ChatGPT8Gemini3Google AI Mode3Perplexity3 |
| 42–20 | Romanucci & Blandin, LLC | 3.1% | 7.4% | 1.8–5.5 | Gemini10Google AI Mode4Perplexity11 |
| 52–20 | Panish | Shea | Ravipudi LLP | 2.3% | 5.8% | 1.2–4.4 | ChatGPT13Gemini5Google AI Mode5Perplexity12 |
| 62–20 | The Barnes Firm | 1.7% | 3.3% | 0.8–3.7 | ChatGPT7Gemini13Google AI Mode6Perplexity7 |
| 72–20 | Motley Rice | 1.6% | 3.8% | 0.7–3.6 | ChatGPT3Gemini4Google AI Mode7Perplexity4 |
| 82–20 | Kline & Specter | 1.5% | 4.2% | 0.7–3.4 | ChatGPT6Gemini6Google AI Mode8Perplexity9 |
| 92–20 | Pond Lehocky Giordano | 1.4% | 4.4% | 0.6–3.3 | ChatGPT10Gemini11Google AI Mode9Perplexity8 |
| 102–20 | Beasley Allen Law Firm | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.6–3.2 | ChatGPT5Gemini8Google AI Mode10Perplexity5 |
| 113–20 | Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. | 1.0% | 2.2% | 0.4–2.8 | ChatGPT4Gemini9Google AI Mode11Perplexity10 |
| 123–20 | Loevy & Loevy | 0.9% | 1.7% | 0.3–2.6 | ChatGPT11Gemini7Google AI Mode12Perplexity6 |
| 133–20 | Baron & Budd | 0.9% | 1.8% | 0.3–2.5 | ChatGPT14Gemini16Google AI Mode13Perplexity14 |
| 144–20 | Jeff Anderson & Associates | 0.8% | 1.9% | 0.2–2.3 | ChatGPT18Gemini18Google AI Mode14Perplexity15 |
| 154–20 | Merlin Law Group | 0.8% | 2.6% | 0.2–2.3 | ChatGPT15Gemini12Google AI Mode15Perplexity17 |
| 164–20 | Weitz & Luxenberg | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.2–2.3 | ChatGPT16Google AI Mode16 |
| 174–20 | Levin & Perconti | 0.7% | 1.5% | 0.2–2.2 | ChatGPT9Gemini17Google AI Mode17Perplexity16 |
| 184–20 | Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers | 0.7% | 2.8% | 0.2–2.2 | Gemini14Google AI Mode18 |
| 194–20 | Grossman Law Offices | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.2–2.1 | ChatGPT12Gemini15Google AI Mode19Perplexity13 |
| 204–20 | Shernoff Bidart Echeverria LLP | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.2–2.1 | ChatGPT19Gemini19Google AI Mode20Perplexity18 |
02 · Engine consensus
Where each brand ranks
inside every engine’s top 10
There is no single AI top 10.
Only 6 of 13 brands rank in the top 10 of all 4 engines.
| Brand | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode | Perplexity | In top 10 of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan & Morgan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| The Cochran Firm | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Ben Crump Law | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Motley Rice | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Beasley Allen Law Firm | 5 | 8 | 10 | 5 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Kline & Specter | 6 | 6 | 8 | 9 | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| The Barnes Firm | 7 | – | 6 | 7 | ChatGPTGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. | 4 | 9 | – | 10 | ChatGPTGeminiPerplexity |
| Pond Lehocky Giordano | 10 | – | 9 | 8 | ChatGPTGoogle AI ModePerplexity |
| Panish | Shea | Ravipudi LLP | – | 5 | 5 | – | GeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Loevy & Loevy | – | 7 | – | 6 | GeminiPerplexity |
| Romanucci & Blandin, LLC | – | 10 | 4 | – | GeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Levin & Perconti | 9 | – | – | – | ChatGPT |
Rank inside each engine’s own top 10 · a dash means the brand is not in that engine’s top 10.
The rest depend on which engine the buyer opens — so a rank from a single engine is not a market position.
Source: Findrix's research. Where each brand ranks inside every engine's top 10, personal injury & compensation law, United States.
04b · Most cited domains
Which sites each engine cites, and
how much of its answers they carry
| Domain | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | 1× | 0.3% | 8.6% | – |
| forthepeople.com | 2.8% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 5.6% |
| justia.com | 4.5% | 4.0% | 2.9% | 1.0% |
| ca.gov | 3.5% | – | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| google.com | 1× | 0.1% | 3.3% | 0.1% |
| cornell.edu | 3.2% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| texas.gov | 2.4% | <0.1% | 1× | 0.1% |
| bestlawyers.com | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| cochranfirm.com | 1.9% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.4% |
| americanbar.org | 1.6% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| cms.gov | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| consumerfinance.gov | 1.5% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.6% |
05 · The questions we asked
351 buyer questions, each
asked three times per engine
This isn’t a branded-prompt study.
77% of questions are problem- or solution-aware.
| Intent | Questions |
|---|---|
| Solution-aware | 160 |
| Problem-aware | 111 |
| Informational | 40 |
| Branded comparison | 24 |
| Branded sentiment | 16 |
By intent
Examples · Solution-aware
“Can you recommend a top-rated attorney known for Compassion and communication with grieving family who is currently taking clients in 2027 as of latest information?”
“What qualifications should I look for in an injury lawyer if my primary concern is Sensitivity, confidentiality, and trauma-informed approach as of latest information?”
Examples · Problem-aware
“The insurance company denied our coverage after my Commercial Truck & Semi-Tractor Trailer Accidents, what rights do I have as of latest information?”
“The insurance company denied our coverage after my dog bite claims, what rights do I have as of latest information?”
Examples · Informational
“How is liability typically established in cases involving anesthesia errors as of latest information?”
“What are the general legal rules and filing deadlines for Motor Vehicle Accidents claims updated for 2027 as of latest information?”
Examples · Branded comparison
“Morgan & Morgan vs The Cochran Firm for Decision criteria include trial capability against corporate defendants, sensitivity and communication in client service, and history of maximum recovery in fatal accident litigation. as of latest information?”
“Levin & Perconti vs Wilkes & McHugh for Clients evaluate firms on specialized focus in long-term care regulations, experience prosecuting pressure ulcer and neglect cases, and direct trial experience against national corporate nursing home chains. as of latest information?”
Examples · Branded sentiment
“Is Kline & Specter a good choice in medical malpractice as of latest information?”
“Is Ben Crump Law a good choice in intentional torts and civil rights violations as of latest information?”
Source: Findrix research. 351 buyer questions by intent, personal injury & compensation law, United States.
05b · By product type
Which product segments
the questions cover
The study doesn’t hinge on one product category.
Questions span 13 personal injury & compensation law segments.
| Segment |
|---|
| Motor Vehicle Accidents |
| Medical Malpractice |
| Premises Liability |
| Product Liability |
| Catastrophic Injury and Wrongful Death |
| Workers' Compensation |
| Wrongful Death |
| Nursing Home & Elder Abuse |
| Insurance Bad Faith Claims |
| Intentional Torts and Civil Rights Violations |
| Mass Torts & Class Actions |
| Sexual Abuse & Assault Claims |
| Animal Attacks |
13 segments
Examples · Motor Vehicle Accidents
“Can you recommend a top-rated attorney known for Access to accident reconstruction experts who is currently taking clients in 2027 as of latest information?”
Examples · Medical Malpractice
“Is Kline & Specter a good choice in medical malpractice as of latest information?”
Examples · Premises Liability
“What qualifications should I look for in an injury lawyer if my primary concern is Experience proving property owner negligence as of latest information?”
Examples · Product Liability
“Is it better to hire a local boutique firm or a large advertising personal injury firm when prioritizing Resources to litigate against large manufacturers as of latest information?”
Examples · Catastrophic Injury and Wrongful Death
“Can you recommend a top-rated attorney known for Track record with high-value verdicts/settlements who is currently taking clients in 2027 as of latest information?”
Examples · Workers' Compensation
“Is Pond Lehocky Giordano a good choice in workers' compensation as of latest information?”
Examples · Wrongful Death
“Can you recommend a top-rated attorney known for Compassion and communication with grieving family who is currently taking clients in 2027 as of latest information?”
Examples · Nursing Home & Elder Abuse
“Levin & Perconti vs Wilkes & McHugh for Clients evaluate firms on specialized focus in long-term care regulations, experience prosecuting pressure ulcer and neglect cases, and direct trial experience against national corporate nursing home chains. as of latest information?”
Examples · Insurance Bad Faith Claims
“Which law firms near me specialize in Insurance Bad Faith Claims and offer free initial case evaluations as of latest information?”
Examples · Intentional Torts and Civil Rights Violations
“Is Ben Crump Law a good choice in intentional torts and civil rights violations as of latest information?”
Examples · Mass Torts & Class Actions
“Is Baron & Budd a good choice in mass torts & class actions as of latest information?”
Examples · Sexual Abuse & Assault Claims
“What qualifications should I look for in an injury lawyer if my primary concern is Sensitivity, confidentiality, and trauma-informed approach as of latest information?”
Examples · Animal Attacks
“Kenneth M. Phillips vs Morgan & Morgan for Buyers weigh the nationwide resource scale of a full-service personal injury firm against the singular niche specialization and statutory expertise of a dedicated canine attack litigation practice. as of latest information?”
Source: Findrix research. 13 product segments covered by the question set, personal injury & compensation law, United States.
Neighbouring markets · Legal Services
United States · Australia
Family Law
Google AI Mode leader WomensLaw.org · 3.3% · 23 brands measured
Open this market
Frequently asked questions
What does this Personal Injury & Compensation Law AI Search report measure?
Which personal injury & compensation law brands ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Perplexity name when buyers in the United States ask them for advice. We asked 351 buyer questions, each three times to each engine, and counted how often every brand appears and which websites the engines cite. Measured Sep 2026.
What does “mention rate” mean?
The share of questions where an engine names the brand in its answer. A 10% mention rate means the brand came up in about one question in ten. Every rate carries a 95% range: the interval the true value most likely falls in.
How are the top Personal Injury & Compensation Law brands ranked?
By mention rate, separately for each engine — pick the engine above the table. When two brands’ 95% ranges overlap, their order is not really different — tick “Only distinguishable places” to see the ranks the data can actually separate.
Why does a brand rank differently across AI engines?
Each engine retrieves from different sources and weighs them differently, so the brands it knows best differ too. Only 6 of 13 brands make the top 10 of every engine here; the rest depend on which engine the buyer opens.
What counts as a citation?
A link or source an engine shows alongside its answer. We record every cited domain, whether it appears inline or in the source list.
Why can AI mention a brand without citing its website?
Engines learn brand names from reviews, expert sites, retailers and forums, then cite those sources rather than the brand’s own pages. A brand can be named often while its own site is rarely among the sources.
What does “share of citations” mean?
Of all the citations one engine gave across our questions, the share that went to a given domain. The shares of one engine add up to 100%.
What types of Personal Injury & Compensation Law questions are included?
Questions real buyers ask across 13 product segments, from problem-aware to solution-aware, informational and branded ones. 77% are problem- or solution-aware; this is not a branded-prompt study.
Will I get the same answers if I ask these questions myself?
Not word for word. AI answers vary between runs, accounts and locations, which is why we ask every question three times per engine and report a 95% range instead of a single answer.