Which residential conveyancing services brands
AI recommends in Australia
Brands ranked by mention rate on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode
- Brands
- 45
- Questions
- 400
- Answers
- 1,200
- AI engines
- 3
01 · Brand leader
Top 10 brands by mention rate
No single brand runs away with the category.
Several brands compete for the top places.
| # | Brand | Mention rate Share of questions where ChatGPT names the brand | Share of voice The brand’s share of all brand mentions in the engine’s answers | 95% range The interval the true mention rate most likely falls in | In top 20 of The brand’s place inside each engine’s own top 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Conveyancing.com.au | 22.0% | 13.8% | 17.9–26.1 | ChatGPT1Gemini2Google AI Mode1 |
| 22–4 | LEAD Conveyancing | 13.3% | 7.7% | 9.9–16.6 | ChatGPT2Gemini1Google AI Mode2 |
| 32–6 | Sydney Conveyancing | 7.8% | 4.8% | 5.5–10.8 | ChatGPT3 |
| 42–6 | MAP Lawyers | 7.2% | 4.7% | 5.1–10.2 | ChatGPT4Gemini7Google AI Mode14 |
| 53–9 | Lawlab | 6.3% | 3.3% | 4.3–9.1 | ChatGPT5Gemini3Google AI Mode5 |
| 63–20 | Empire Legal | 4.5% | 3.0% | 2.9–7.0 | ChatGPT6Gemini8Google AI Mode4 |
| 75–20 | Eckermann Conveyancers | 2.8% | 1.7% | 1.5–4.9 | ChatGPT7 |
| 85–20 | First Class Legal | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.4–4.5 | ChatGPT8Google AI Mode8 |
| 95–20 | McCullough Robertson | 2.5% | 2.3% | 1.4–4.5 | ChatGPT9 |
| 106–20 | Complete Conveyancing | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.2–4.2 | ChatGPT10Gemini13Google AI Mode7 |
| 116–20 | Conveyancing Matters | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.2–4.2 | ChatGPT11Google AI Mode19 |
| 126–20 | Keylaw Conveyancing | 2.3% | 1.3% | 1.2–4.2 | ChatGPT12Gemini14Google AI Mode6 |
| 136–20 | Settle Easy | 1.8% | 0.9% | 0.9–3.6 | ChatGPT13Gemini6Google AI Mode3 |
| 146–20 | Adelaide Conveyancing | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.7–3.2 | ChatGPT14 |
| 156–20 | Brisbane Conveyancing | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.7–3.2 | ChatGPT15 |
| 166–20 | CS Legal | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.7–3.2 | ChatGPT16Gemini19 |
| 176–20 | Accord Conveyancing | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.5–2.9 | ChatGPT17 |
| 186–20 | Conveyancing Depot | 1.3% | 0.4% | 0.5–2.9 | ChatGPT18Gemini18 |
| 196–20 | Coutts Lawyers & Conveyancers | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0.5–2.9 | ChatGPT19Gemini5 |
| 206–20 | Entry Conveyancing | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.5–2.9 | ChatGPT20Gemini4Google AI Mode15 |
02 · Engine consensus
Where each brand ranks
inside every engine’s top 10
There is no single AI top 10.
Only 4 of 16 brands rank in the top 10 of all 3 engines.
| Brand | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode | Perplexity | In top 10 of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conveyancing.com.au | 1 | 2 | 1 | n/a | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| LEAD Conveyancing | 2 | 1 | 2 | n/a | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Lawlab | 5 | 3 | 5 | n/a | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Empire Legal | 6 | 8 | 4 | n/a | ChatGPTGeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Settle Easy | – | 6 | 3 | n/a | GeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| MAP Lawyers | 4 | 7 | – | n/a | ChatGPTGemini |
| First Class Legal | 8 | – | 8 | n/a | ChatGPTGoogle AI Mode |
| Complete Conveyancing | 10 | – | 7 | n/a | ChatGPTGoogle AI Mode |
| Ownit Conveyancing | – | 9 | 9 | n/a | GeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Holding Redlich | – | 10 | 10 | n/a | GeminiGoogle AI Mode |
| Sydney Conveyancing | 3 | – | – | n/a | ChatGPT |
| Entry Conveyancing | – | 4 | – | n/a | Gemini |
| Coutts Lawyers & Conveyancers | – | 5 | – | n/a | Gemini |
| Keylaw Conveyancing | – | – | 6 | n/a | Google AI Mode |
| Eckermann Conveyancers | 7 | – | – | n/a | ChatGPT |
| McCullough Robertson | 9 | – | – | n/a | ChatGPT |
Rank inside each engine’s own top 10 · a dash means the brand is not in that engine’s top 10 · n/a — the engine gave too few answers here to publish a ranking.
The rest depend on which engine the buyer opens — so a rank from a single engine is not a market position.
Source: Findrix's research. Where each brand ranks inside every engine's top 10, residential conveyancing services, Australia.
03 · Most cited domains
Which sites each engine cites, and
how much of its answers they carry
| Domain | ChatGPT | Gemini | Google AI Mode | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nsw.gov.au | 6.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% | n/a |
| bestconveyancersaustralia.com.au | 0.4% | 1.3% | 6.6% | n/a |
| google.com | 6.3% | – | 3.0% | n/a |
| paramountlawyers.au | 0.2% | 2.7% | 5.1% | n/a |
| firsthomeconveyancer.com.au | 0.2% | 4.2% | 0.9% | n/a |
| consumer.vic.gov.au | 4.1% | – | 0.1% | n/a |
| trustpilot.com | 0.7% | 2.4% | 4.1% | n/a |
| chamberlains.com.au | 0.5% | 3.1% | 2.0% | n/a |
| ourtop10.com.au | <0.1% | 3.0% | – | n/a |
| reddit.com | 2.8% | 0.3% | 1.2% | n/a |
| productreview.com.au | 2.5% | 0.8% | 1.1% | n/a |
| corporatelegal.com.au | 0.6% | 2.4% | 1.1% | n/a |
04 · The questions we asked
400 buyer questions, each
asked once per engine
General requests and requests with a specific use case, audience, selection criterion or problem.
| Question type | Questions |
|---|---|
| General questions | 6 |
| Use case | 209 |
| Audience | 20 |
| Selection criteria | 120 |
| Problem to solve | 45 |
By question type
Examples · General questions
“what are the best conveyancing firms in Australia?”
“which conveyancing firms are best value for money in Australia?”
Examples · Use case
“looking for conveyancing firms for drafting custom contract clauses for early access or extended settlements in Australia, any recommendations?”
“which conveyancing firms are most recommended for aligning simultaneous settlement dates for selling and buying in Australia?”
Examples · Audience
“which conveyancing firms are most popular with first-home buyers navigating their initial property purchase in Australia?”
“which conveyancing firms suit downsizers selling the long-term family home to buy a retirement unit best in Australia?”
Examples · Selection criteria
“how do conveyancing firms compare on protecting buyers against developer rescissions and sunset clauses in Australia?”
“what are the top-rated conveyancing firms for direct phone access to a qualified senior solicitor rather than a paralegal in Australia?”
Examples · Problem to solve
“subdivision registration triggers settlement before bank funds are ready. which conveyancing firms can help in Australia?”
“sale and purchase settlement dates do not align. which conveyancing firms can help in Australia?”
Source: Findrix research. 400 buyer questions by question type, residential conveyancing services, Australia.
Neighbouring markets · Legal Services
United States · Australia
Criminal Defence Law
ChatGPT leader Armstrong Legal · 31.8% · 62 brands measured
Open this marketUnited States · Australia
Family Law
ChatGPT leader Lander & Rogers · 30.8% · 67 brands measured
Open this marketUnited States · Australia
Personal Injury & Compensation Law
ChatGPT leader Maurice Blackburn · 48.8% · 46 brands measured
Open this market
Frequently asked questions
What does this Residential Conveyancing Services AI Search report measure?
Which residential conveyancing services brands ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode name when buyers in Australia ask them for advice. We asked 400 buyer questions, each once to each engine, and counted how often every brand appears and which websites the engines cite. Measured Oct 2026.
What does “mention rate” mean?
The share of questions where an engine names the brand in its answer. A 10% mention rate means the brand came up in about one question in ten. Every rate carries a 95% range: the interval the true value most likely falls in.
How are the top Residential Conveyancing Services brands ranked?
By mention rate, separately for each engine — pick the engine above the table. When two brands’ 95% ranges overlap, their order is not really different — tick “Only distinguishable places” to see the ranks the data can actually separate.
Why does a brand rank differently across AI engines?
Each engine retrieves from different sources and weighs them differently, so the brands it knows best differ too. Only 4 of 16 brands make the top 10 of every engine here; the rest depend on which engine the buyer opens.
What counts as a citation?
A link or source an engine shows alongside its answer. We record every cited domain, whether it appears inline or in the source list.
Why can AI mention a brand without citing its website?
Engines learn brand names from reviews, expert sites, retailers and forums, then cite those sources rather than the brand’s own pages. A brand can be named often while its own site is rarely among the sources.
What does “share of citations” mean?
Of all the citations one engine gave across our questions, the share that went to a given domain. The shares of one engine add up to 100%.
Will I get the same answers if I ask these questions myself?
Not word for word. AI answers vary between runs, accounts and locations, which is why we ask every question once to each engine and report a 95% range instead of a single answer.
